This post contains excerpts from Robert Pirsig's book Lila: An Inquiry Into Morals.

The words are all his, the editing choices are all mine, the consequences of reading are all yours.

Table of Contents | How This Happened | Download PDF

Dynamic & Static

Trying to create a perfect metaphysics is like trying to create the perfect chess opening, one that will win every time. You can’t do it.

… Dynamic Quality is the pre-intellectual cutting edge of reality, the source of all things, completely simple and always new … It’s only perceived good is freedom and it’s only perceived evil is static quality itself … any pattern of one-sided fixed value that tries to contain and kill the ongoing free force of life.

Static Quality emerges in the wake of Dynamic Quality. It is old and complex. It always contains a component of memory … Good is conformity to an established pattern of fixed values and value objects. Static morality is full of heroes and villains, loves and hatreds, carrots and sticks. It’s values don’t change by themselves. Unless they are altered by Dynamic Quality they say the same thing year after year … sometimes loudly … sometimes softly … always the same

… When the person who sits on the stove first discovers his low-quality situation, the front edge of his experience is dynamic. He does not think ‘This stove is hot’ and then make a rational decision to get off … a ‘dim perception of he knows not what’ gets him off dynamically. Later he generates static patterns of thought to explain the situation.

A subject-object metaphysics presumes that this kind of Dynamic action without thought is rare and ignored it when possible. But mystic learning goes in the opposite direction and tries to hold to the ongoing Dynamic edge of all experience, both positive & negative … of the two kinds of students, those who study only subject-object science and those who study only meditative mysticism … it would be the mystic students who would get off the stove first. The purpose of mystic meditation is not to remove oneself from experience but to bring one’s self closer … by eliminating static attachments

… imagine that you walk down the street past a car where someone has the radio on and it plays a tune you’ve never heard before but which is so fantastically good it just stops you in your tracks. You listen until it’s done. Days later you remember exactly what the street looked like when you heard that music… store window, colors of cars, clouds in the sky … and it all comes back so vividly you wonder what song they were playing, so you wait until you hear it again …

One day it comes on the radio and you get the same feeling again.. you catch the name … rush to the store … and buy it … You get home. You play it. It’s really good. It doesn’t quite transform the room … but it’s really good. You play it again. Really good. You play it another time. Still good but you are not sure you want to play it again. But you play it again … it’s okay … you put it away … The next day you play it again, and it’s OK, but something is gone … you file it away and once in a while play it again for a friend …

What has happened? … has the song lost its quality? Either it’s good or it’s not good. If it’s good why don’t you play it? The first good that made you want to buy the record was Dynamic Quality … comes as a sort of surprise … weakened for a moment your existing static patterns in such a way that the Dynamic Quality all around you shone through. It was free … The second good,the kind that made you want to recommend it to a friend,even when you had lost your own enthusiasm for it is Static Quality.

“Static Quality emerges in the wake of Dynamic Quality.”

One Comment

  1. Mark Campbell
    Posted October 18, 2022 at 4:54 am | Permalink

    Hi Ronen, this is Mark Campbell. I really like that you are continuing to maintain this site because it has proved useful to me. I want to suggest that Static Quality need not be the villain in the story since it may inspire others to lean towards Dynamic Quality even though it is Static Quality from the viewpoint of another. When an original piece of music is created by someone who felt moved and inspired by Dynamic Quality it soon becomes a thing that is not so inspirational to the creator herself. It has become a thing of Static Quality that the creator must hold lightly so that she can properly orient again towards Dynamic Quality to continue to create inspirational music. Even so the same music that is Static Quality to her may inspire millions of others for centuries to come, each one seeing the world anew the first time they hear the music. For them this is as precious a link to Dynamic Quality as when the creator first experienced her inspiration.

5 Trackbacks

  • By Maybe | iamronen on February 6, 2011 at 11:57 am

    […] It is an eventual shift or refinment in my values that causes a “maybe” question to become a “yes” or “no” question. It is curious to me that a momentum towards improvement lies in  “maybe” questions. It is the things I don’t know that, if I let them, lead me to Quality. […]

  • By Yoga Therapy: Degeneracy and Yoga - iamronen on May 19, 2012 at 8:47 am

    […] Degeneracy is simply demonstrated in a popular game. The first person in a group of people whispers a message into the ear of another person, and that person whispers it into the ear of another …  and the message moves from one person to another in whispers. By the time the message reaches the last person it has morphed into something else. The original message degenerated into another message. It isn’t good or bad – it’s a natural process of deterioration. If you learn to see it – it is everywhere. […]

  • […] dynamic and static indeed … and also … how to juggle these two qualities […]

  • […] a beautiful illustration of the nature and manifestation of static quality […]

  • By Reading Lila - Dynamic - iamronen on June 11, 2017 at 9:14 am

    […] Dynamic Quality is a higher moral order than scientific truth, and it is as immoral for philosophers of science to try to suppress Dynamic Quality as it is for church authorities to suppress scientific method. Dynamic value is an integral part of science. It is the cutting edge of scientific progress itself. […]

Leave a Reply